A SOC Threat Intelligence Investigation. TryHackMe First Shift CTF — Task 3: Probably Just Fine

A SOC Threat Intelligence Investigation. TryHackMe First Shift CTF — Task 3: Probably Just Fine

in

A SOC Threat Intelligence Investigation. TryHackMe First Shift CTF — Task 3: Probably Just Fine

A practical walkthrough of SOC investigation techniques, including IOC analysis, malware classification, and MITRE ATT&CK mapping.

Introduction

This write-up documents a Threat Intelligence investigation based on Task 3: Probably Just Fine of the First Shift CTF room on TryHackMe.

In this scenario, I take on the role of a Security Operations Center (SOC) Analyst, tasked with analyzing indicators of compromise (IOCs) such as IP addresses, file hashes, domains, and threat intelligence reports.

This task simulates a real-world SOC workflow, where analysts must pivot across multiple intelligence sources to:

  • Enrich indicators
  • Identify malicious infrastructure
  • Correlate threat activity
  • Map findings to frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK

The objective is to demonstrate practical defensive security skills, including OSINT usage, malware analysis, and threat attribution.


Process:
I performed a WHOIS lookup on the suspicious IP using DomainTools to identify ownership and network attribution.

1_X5qxkxUDgt08KUkBte-5ZQ.png

Answer: 212238


Q2. Which service is offered from this IP?

Process:
Using the provided file hash, I searched the TryDetectThis Threat Intelligence platform.

1_d1ZrA3UWrJZmT2AvASkjxQ.png

Under Detections and Reports, I reviewed linked intelligence sources, including a report from Recorded Future. This provided contextual information about infrastructure usage.

1_fqdTQaBp8KakfLfUKgzXwQ.png

Answer: VPN


Process:
From the same hash lookup results, I navigated to the File Details section to identify the associated filename.

1_cYBwlR_RljdhzS2TjIyY7A.png

Answer: zY9sqWs.exe


Q4. What is the threat signature that Microsoft assigned to the file?

Process:
Within the Vendor Analysis section of the intelligence results, I identified the detection name assigned by Microsoft.

1_yJpoQyA6QMZ09y1PfEllKw.png

Answer: Trojan:Win32/LummaStealer.PM!MTB


Q5. One of the contacted domains is part of a large malicious infrastructure cluster. Based on its HTTPS certificate, how many domains are linked to the same campaign?

Process:
I searched for the domain gadgethgfub.icu in the Threat Intelligence platform.

1_hL8hbPFZlVbhYtPZDCfvrA.png

In the HTTPS Certificate Data section, I reviewed the Subject Alternative Name (SAN) field, which lists associated domains sharing the same certificate.

1_vPdqFx3brYT41GyBTUVY2w.png

I exported the domain list into a text editor with line numbering enabled to accurately count the entries.

1_K-GEZD4CyqyYzetafg46TQ.png

Answer: 151


Q6. The file matches one of the YARA rules made by “kevoreilly”. What line is present in the rule’s “condition” field?

Process:
In the YARA Rules section of the intelligence platform, I accessed the linked GitHub repository.

By reviewing the rule definition, I identified the relevant condition logic.

1_OQlMetMFjZHjtVNTl9Npzw.png

Answer: uint16(0) == 0x5a4d and any of them


Q7. The file is also mentioned in one of the TI reports. What is the title of the report mentioning this hash?

Process:
Under Detections and Reports, I navigated to the Reports section and followed the referenced link to confirm the report title.

1_9kEBACBUKypTMdq_DrYHsg.png

1_kKFXcY6mxVirWx0W02OKsg.png

Answer: Behind the Curtain: How Lumma Affiliates Operate


Q8. Which team did the author of the malware start collaborating with in early 2024?

Process:
I reviewed the same threat intelligence report and identified collaboration details within the campaign analysis.

1_cD_KjhKgYt4qM0vR6ZlfrQ.png

Answer: GhostSocks


Process:
Continuing analysis of the report, I identified references to additional malware families used by affiliates.

1_lJLonpufz7r156ulqoMV5w.png

Answer: CraxsRAT


Q10. The report states that the affiliates behind the malware use the services of AnonRDP. Which MITRE ATT&CK sub-technique does this align with?

Process:
Based on the use of rented infrastructure services like AnonRDP, I mapped this behavior to the relevant MITRE ATT&CK sub-technique under the Resource Development tactic.

![1-6JkgqhnVJM97mkrLi-gsQ.png](../assets/images/posts/probably-just-fine/1-6JkgqhnVJM97mkrLi-gsQ.png)

Answer: T1583.003


Conclusion

This task highlights the importance of threat intelligence correlation and analytical thinking in SOC environments.

By pivoting across multiple data sources — such as WHOIS records, malware databases, and intelligence reports — I was able to:

  • Attribute malicious infrastructure
  • Identify malware characteristics
  • Map attacker behavior to standardized frameworks

These are essential skills for detecting and responding to modern cyber threats.


Key Skills Demonstrated

  • Threat Intelligence Analysis
  • IOC Enrichment (IP, hash, domain)
  • OSINT Investigation
  • Malware Classification
  • YARA Rule Analysis
  • Threat Actor Profiling
  • MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Tools & Platforms Used

  • DomainTools (WHOIS lookup)
  • TryDetectThis (Threat Intelligence Platform)
  • Public Threat Intelligence Reports
  • GitHub (YARA rule analysis)